121 F.3d 718 (Table), 1997 WL 453705 (9th Cir.(Cal.))

 

NOTICE:  THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION.

 

(The Court’s decision is referenced in a “Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions” appearing in the Federal Reporter. Use FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 for rules regarding the citation of unpublished opinions.)

 

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

 

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BOBBY JOE KEESEE, Defendant-Appellant.

 

No. 96-50388.

 

Submitted June 5, 1997 [FN***]

 

FN*** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument Fed. R.App. P. 34(a) 9th

 

Decided June 30, 1997.

 

 

RELATED REFERENCE:  United States v. Keesee, 82 F.3d 407 (Table) (3d Cir. 1996)

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, CR-94-1048-JGD; John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding.

 

JUDGES: Brunetti and O’Scannlain, Circuit Judges, and Hogan, [FN**] Chief District Judge.

 

FN** The Honorable Michael R. Hogan, Chief District Court Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

 

MEMORANDUM [FN*]

 

FN* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 

 

[**1]  Appellant Bobby Joe Keesee appeals from the final order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California sentencing him to 46 months incarceration. Keesee was extradited from the Federal Republic of Germany and contends the sentencing judge violated the United States–Germany extradition treaty by considering conduct other than that for which he was extradited.

 

A defendant is not “punished” for non-charged conduct simply because the court considers that conduct at sentencing. See Witte v. United States, 515 U.S. 389, 115 S.Ct. 2199 (1995); McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79 (1986). Other circuit courts have applied this principle in the extradition context. See United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1322 (1996); United States v. Davis, 954 F.2d 182 (4th Cir.1992); Leighnor v. Turner, 884 F.2d 385 (8th Cir.1989); United States v. Thirion, 813 F.2d 146 (8th Cir.1987). Because Keesee was not sentenced or otherwise punished for an offense for which he was not extradited, the district court did not violate the United States–Germany extradition treaty.

 

AFFIRMED.

 

•  Appellate Brief, October 15, 1996, Brief of Appellant Keesee

•  Appellate Brief, November 12, 1996,  Brief of Appellee United States