Miami Herald
Posted on Tue, Dec. 06, 2005
Jury clears former Florida professor of terrorism-related charge
By PHIL LONG AND MARTIN MERZER
TAMPA - A former college professor was found not guilty Tuesday of key charges
linking him to a Palestinian terrorist group that allegedly operated an
underground cell in Florida, ending a lengthy trial that balanced allegations
of terrorist-related acts against assertions of abused constitutional rights.
After 13 days of deliberation, a federal jury acquitted Sami Al-Arian, once
a computer sciences professor at the University of South Florida, of eight of
the 17 charges against him -- including a charge that he conspired with other
leaders of Palestinian Islamic Jihad to murder and maim people in Israel.
The 12-member jury deadlocked on the nine other counts against him,
including charges that he aided terrorists.
Al-Arian wept in relief as the verdicts were read. One of his attorneys,
Linda Moreno, hugged him.
''I'm so grateful to God because He's the one who showed my husband's
innocence,'' said Nahla Al-Arian, the defendant's wife. She also thanked the
jury ``that showed there was no case and my husband was innocent.''
Two other pro-Palestinian activists, Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayed
Ballut, were found not guilty of all charges. The fourth man ensnared in 2003
by the federal government's sweeping 51-count indictment, Hatem Naji Fariz, was
acquitted on 25 charges, with the jury unable to decide on eight others.
After serving 33 months in jail awaiting trial and a verdict, Al-Arian was
returned to prison and will remain there until prosecutors decide whether to
retry him and Fariz on the deadlocked charges. Fariz, who was not held in jail
during the trial, remained free.
Taken as a whole, the verdict dealt a blow to one of the federal
government's first major tests of the expanded search and surveillance powers
authorized by the controversial Patriot Act, which was passed shortly after the
terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The four defendants had been accused of racketeering, conspiracy to maim
and murder, and providing material support for Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Branded by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization, the PIJ reportedly
has killed more than 100 people in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
The indictment did not allege a connection to al Qaeda or to any attacks on
U.S. soil, but it was issued -- amid considerable fanfare by the Bush
administration -- within 18 months of the Sept. 11 attacks and as the United
States prepared for war with Iraq.
The case also played a key role in last year's U.S. Senate campaign in
Florida and was widely monitored and analyzed by the national media.
In the end, after more than five months of testimony by nearly 80 witnesses
and the presentation of 1,800 faxes, wiretap transcripts, email and other
exhibits, most observers believed that no single piece of evidence directly
linked the defendants to terrorist acts.
Rather, the case boiled down to the jury's interpretation of a long series
of statements and actions.
On Tuesday, the jury of seven men and five women found that those
statements and actions did not rise above the threshold of guilt.
But the jury could not complete the job. One juror complained Tuesday that
holdouts were being intimidated as the panel sought unanimity on the remaining
charges.
''I am sorry to say at this time I can no longer deliberate under the
conditions you put forth,'' the unidentified juror said in a note to U.S.
District Judge James S. Moody Jr., one day after Moody urged the jury to seek
agreement on all charges. ``Being that I am in the minority, I feel I am being
whipped to change and I am not alone . . .. My nerves and my conscience are
being whipped into submission.''
Born in Kuwait of Palestinian parents, Al-Arian arrived in the United
States in 1975, began teaching at USF in 1986 and helped establish two
pro-Palestinian groups in Tampa, including one that called itself an Islamic
think tank.
His brother-in-law, Mazen Al-Najjar, made headlines when he was held on
secret evidence for three years and deported in 2002. Many observers believed
federal authorities detained and held Al-Najjar in the hope he would turn
against Al-Arian.
During the trial that ended Tuesday, prosecutors said the defendants'
activities, including the collection and transfer of funds for the families of
some people responsible for terrorist acts, proved that the four conspired to
facilitate terrorist attacks and rendered the men just as guilty as the suicide
bombers and other attackers.
Five others charged in the February 2003 indictment were never apprehended.
''The men of the PIJ you got to know in this case, they didn't strap bombs
to their bodies,'' prosecutor Cherie Krigsman told the jury during final
arguments on Nov. 7. ``They leave that to somebody else.''
She and other prosecutors focused much of their fire on Al-Arian, 47, a
high-profile supporter of the Palestinian cause who had been under federal
investigation -- and subjected to hyperactive and sometimes lurid coverage by
the Tampa Tribune and other media outlets -- since at least 1995.
Prosecutors called him a ''crime boss'' who exploited his position at USF
and the nation's freedoms of speech and travel.
''Sami Al-Arian was a professor by day and a terrorist by night,'' Krigsman
told the jury.
She and others pointed in particular to a videotaped statement in which
Al-Arian said, ''Death to Israel,'' and letters and statements that seemed to
rejoice over attacks that killed Israeli civilians.
Those came in contrast to Al-Arian's more moderate and public statements,
in which he claimed to oppose such attacks.
''It is wrong,'' Al-Arian told The Herald in 1998. ``Anything that has to
do with civilian casualties, it is just morally wrong, religiously wrong as
well as politically wrong. How can you get people with you when you're doing
that?''
Defense attorneys said the trial failed to show a direct connection between
the defendants and acts of terrorism. Rather, they said, the four raised money
for legitimate Palestinian charities and were being punished for holding and
expressing unpopular political views.
In addition, many of their statements and actions came before the
government designated Palestinian Islamic Jihad as a terrorist organization in
January 1995.
''At the end of the day, when you think about wiretaps, think about what's
not there,'' William Moffitt, one of Al-Arian's lawyers, said during closing
arguments. ``There's not one discussion of planning violent activity.''
Earlier, he had rested Al-Arian's case without calling a single witness.
Later that day, Moffitt told reporters:
``There's a document. It's called the U.S. Constitution. Unless the
Constitution is repealed in this courtroom, it protects Dr. Al-Arian for his
speech. . .. The fact that Dr. Al-Arian is a Palestinian deprives him of no
civil rights.''
Constitutional issues played a major role in the case, with Moody refusing
to dismiss the case on a defense motion citing freedom of speech. Instead, the
judge cited a Supreme Court ruling that ``communication is the essence of every
conspiracy.''
But he also required prosecutors to thread a legal and semantic needle,
saying they had to demonstrate that the defendants had knowledge of the
terrorist violence and supported it with more than words.
Merely showing sympathy for or an association with the group was not enough
to merit conviction, the judge said.