Ahani v Canada (1051/2002)

 

No Substantial Judicial Treatment

 

 

Court

UN Human Rights Committee

 

Judgment Date

29 March 2004

 

Where Reported

[2004] 3 WLUK 779

(2004) 11 I.H.R.R. 941

(2004) 39 E.H.R.R. SE12

 

Subject

Human rights

 

Other related subjects

Immigration

 

Keywords

Deportation; Refugees; Terrorism; Torture

 

Judge

Judge not specified

 

Case Digest

Abstract

A, an Iranian national, claimed that his return to Iran had violated the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 Art.2, Art.6, Art.7, Art.9, Art.13 and Art.14. A had sought refugee status in Canada, claiming that he had been forced to join the Iranian Foreign Ministry’s assassination branch. In 1992 the Canadian authorities found that he was a Convention refugee, but in 1993 he was detained under the Immigration Act (Canada) s.40, on the ground that his training and background showed that he was likely to engage in terrorism. A government minister refused A’s request to be deported to a third state, even though A asserted that he was at risk of torture if he returned to Iran. A’s appeals and a judicial review failed and he was deported to Iran in 2002, despite the HRC’s request for measures for interim protection under the Human Rights Committee Rules of Procedure r.86.

 

 

Held, upholding the complaint in part, that A’s rights under Art. 9(4), and Art.13, in conjunction with Art.7, had been violated. In addition, Canada had also breached r.86 by deporting A before the HRC could address his allegations. Given the seriousness of the risk of torture, Canada’s action in deporting A in spite of the request for interim protection undermined the protection of Covenant rights. A’s rights under Art.9(4) had been violated by a nine and a half month delay in judicial review proceedings. Further, Art.13, in conjunction with Art.7, had been violated by the ministerial deportation decision because A had been denied the procedural protections necessary in the face of torture allegations and such a denial could not be justified on national security grounds, Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2002 SCC 1, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3 applied.