ESTATE OF ARTHUR S.
FAIRCHILD., 24 TC 408 (1955)
Estate of Arthur S.
Fairchild, Deceased, Homer D. Wheaton and Bank of New York (Formerly Bank of
New York And Fifth Avenue Bank), Executors, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Case Information: [pg. 408]
Code Sec(s):
Docket: Docket No. 47730.
Date Issued: 06/16/1955
HEADNOTE
1. Estate tax. Federal estate tax held not
applicable to estate of a U.S. citizen domiciled in and a resident of the
Virgin Islands at the time of his death.
Reference(s):
Syllabus
Official Tax Court Syllabus
Estate TaxÑCitizen Of The United
StatesÑDomiciled In Virgin IslandsÑSec. 802, I.R.C. (1939).ÑThe decedent, a
lifetime citizen of the United States, domiciled for over 12 years and at the
time of his death in the Virgin Islands, held not a citizen of the United
States within the meaning of section 802, 1939 Code, for Federal estate tax
purposes.
Counsel
Charles Clark Austin, Esq., William J. Reinhart,
Jr., Esq., and Paul D. Seghers, Esq., for the petitioner.
R. P. Hertzog, Esq., for the respondent.
OPINION.
Murdock, Judge:
The Commissioner determined a deficiency of
$101,887.88 in estate tax. The only issue for decision is whether Congress has
made the Federal estate tax applicable to a citizen of the United States
domiciled and residing in the Virgin Islands. The facts have been presented by
a stipulation which is adopted as the findings of fact.
The decedent was a citizen of the United States
from the time of his birth in 1867 to the time of his death on February 10,
1951. He established his domicile in St. Thomas, the Virgin Islands of the
United States, in or about November 1938 and thereafter retained that domicile
until his death at his home there.
His estate, valued at $521,212.60, consisted of
his home and other real estate on the island of St. Thomas valued at
$56,407.14; stocks and bonds valued at $358,263.12, in the custody of a New
York bank; $82,413.51 on deposit in a New York bank; $7,153.84 on deposit in a
Virgin Islands bank; other intangible personal property valued at $6,625.34;
tangible personal property in New York valued at $25; and tangible personal
property in the Virgin Islands valued at $10,324.65.
The will of the decedent was probated in the
Virgin Islands and also in New York. Virgin Islands inheritance tax in the
amount of $19,339.12, based upon a gross estate of $514,611.12, was due and was
paid.[pg. 409]
A Federal estate tax return showing no tax due
was filed with the collector of internal revenue for the second district of New
York. The Commissioner, in determining the deficiency, held "that the
decedent was a citizen of the United States within the meaning of section 802
of the Internal Revenue Code and, therefore, there has been included in his
gross estate the value of all property, real or personal, tangible or
intangible, wherever situated, except real property situated outside the United
States."
The Commissioner argues in this case, as he did
in Estate of Albert DeCaen Smallwood, 11 T. C. 740, that section 802 of the Internal
Revenue Code (1939) applies the provisions of Part II of the estate tax to the
estates of all citizens of the United States, the decedent was a citizen of the
United States, therefore his estate is subject to the tax. He also discusses an
exemption, but the petitioner claims no exemption. The only contention of the
petitioner is that the estate is not subject to Federal estate tax since the
decedent was, for a long time, a resident of and domiciled in the Virgin
Islands, an unincorporated territorial possession of the United States to which
the estate tax laws of the United States have never been expressly extended
and, therefore, do not apply. The petitioner argues that the Virgin Islands is
like Puerto Rico in this respect and theSmallwood case, supra, and Estate of
Clotilde Santiago Rivera, 19 T. C. 271, affd. 214 F. 2d 60, are in point. The
decedents in those two cases were not only residents but also citizens of
Puerto Rico while the stipulation in this case shows only that the decedent was
domiciled in and a resident of the Virgin Islands.
The decedent in the Smallwood case was a
native-born United States citizen who also acquired Puerto Rican citizenship by
residence in the islands for 1 year after March 4, 1927. Act of March 2, 1917,
ch. 145, sec. 5a, as added Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 503, sec. 2, 44 Stat. 1418, and
amended May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158. The decedent in the Rivera case
was a native-born Puerto Rican who was made a citizen of the United States by
virtue of the provisions of the Jones Act of Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, sec. 5, 39
Stat. 951. United States citizenship or the right thereto as of February 25,
1927, has been conferred upon various categories of natives and residents of
the Virgin Islands, Act of June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, sec. 306,
66 Stat. 237, but no provision of law has been called to our attention or
uncovered by our own research which refers to "citizens" of the
Virgin Islands or confers Virgin Islands "citizenship" upon United
States citizens residing therein.
Section 17 of the Organic Act of the Virgin
Islands of the United States, 49 Stat. 1811, effective June 22, 1936, provided
as follows:
Beginning on January 1, 1938, or on such earlier
date subsequent to January 1, 1937, as may be fixed by local law or ordinance
for either municipality, and [pg. 410]thereafter, the franchise shall be vested
in residents of the Virgin Islands who are citizens of the United States,
twenty-one years of age or over, and able to read and write the English
language. Additional qualifications may be prescribed by the legislative
assembly: Provided, however, That no property or income qualification shall
ever be imposed upon or required of any voter, nor shall any discrimination in
qualification be made or based upon difference in race, color, sex, or
religious belief.
The Electoral Ordinance of the Municipality of
St. Thomas and St. John was enacted by the Municipal Council on May 26, 1938,
and approved by the governor of the Virgin Islands on June 3, 1938. It was then
reported to Congress as required by section 16 of the Organic Act and, not
having been annulled, was printed at page 265 et seq. of House Document No. 67,
76th Cong., 1st Sess. (1939). This ordinance provided, in part, as follows:
Section 1: That the right of Franchise shall be
vested in residents of the Virgin Islands who are twenty-one (21) years or
over, citizens of the United States, not legally disqualified, able to read and
write the English language. ***
(b) For the purposes of this Ordinance, residents
of the Virgin Islands shall be persons who have lived in the Virgin Islands for
a period of one year next preceding the election and in the Municipality in
which they desire to vote for a period of six months next preceding the
election and in the district in which they desire to vote for a period of sixty
days next preceding the election.
The right to vote conferred by the Organic Act
and the Electoral Ordinance is the very essence of citizenship and even though
this term is not employed with respect to an inhabitant of the Virgin Islands,
we conclude that the decedent herein occupied the same relationship to the
Virgin Islands as did the decedents in the Smallwood and Rivera cases to Puerto
Rico.
The Government of the United States has adopted
a benevolent attitude toward its unincorporated territorial possessions, and it
is well established that laws of the United States of general application do
not apply to the territorial possessions unless they contain some specific
reference thereto. The Virgin Islands, like Puerto Rico, is an unincorporated
territorial possession of the United States. The Naval Appropriations Act of
1921, 42 Stat. 122, is in part as follows:
The income-tax laws now in force in the United
States of America and those which may hereafter be enacted shall be held to be
likewise in force in the Virgin Islands of the United States, except that the
proceeds of such taxes shall be paid into the treasuries of said islands.
The Organic Act of the Virgin Islands of the
United States provides that all taxes, duties, fees, and public revenues
collected in the Virgin Islands shall be covered into the treasury of the
Virgin Islands including "the proceeds of the United States income tax,
and the proceeds [pg. 411]of any taxes levied by the Congress on the
inhabitants of the Virgin Islands" Act of June 22, 1936, ch. 699, sec. 35,
49 Stat. 1816. Taxes thus collected are to be used for the benefit of the
Virgin Islands. The Federal estate tax laws, however, were never specifically
made applicable to the Virgin Islands but the Virgin Islands has enacted its
own inheritance tax laws with the approval and under the authority of our
Congress.
The conclusion was reached in the Smallwood
andRivera cases, supra, that our Federal estate tax laws do not apply to the
estate of a citizen of the United States who was also a citizen of Puerto Rico
and a resident thereof, since the word "citizen" in section 802 of
the Internal Revenue Code, and subsequent sections, upon which the Commissioner
relies, refers "to citizens residing beyond the limits of the United
States, its territories and possessions." The Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit in the Rivera case quoted with approval the above interpretation
of the word "citizen." The decedent herein was a citizen who did not
reside "beyond the limits of the United States, its territories and
possessions." His estate was properly subjected to the inheritance tax
imposed by the legislative authority of the Virgin Islands of the United
States. Congress, apparently not desiring to subject the estate of such a
person to double death duties, has refrained from imposing our estate tax laws
upon estates of "inhabitants" of the Virgin Islands, including
citizens of the United States long domiciled and residing there. The situation
here is not distinguishable in principle from that considered in the two cited
cases and for reasons similar to those set forth in those cases, we hold that
the decedent was not a citizen of the United States within the meaning of
section 802, Internal Revenue Code, for Federal estate tax purposes.
It is to be noted that our conclusion is in
accord with the views expressed by the Senate Committee on Interior and Insular
Affairs in its report on the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands,
approved July 22, 1954, S. Rept. No. 1271, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (1954). Therein,
the committee stated at page 4 that with the exception of excise taxes,
American citizens in the Virgin Islands were exempt from making any
contribution to the financial support of the American Government. The committee
also voiced the hope, at page 2 of its report, that the enactment of the
Revised Organic Act "would be a step forward toward the day when the
Virgin Islands could be self-sustaining and the American citizens in the islands
could contribute their fair share toward support of their Government."
Decision will be entered under Rule 50.