Current Law Cases
Scope |
contract; offer and acceptance; Lloyd's names
attaching conditions to settlement offer; no acceptance of counter offer |
Case |
Johnson v Society of Lloyd's |
Court |
(CA) Court of Appeal |
Judgment |
July 22, 2002 |
Judges |
David Steel, J. |
Legislation |
Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986 1925) r.6.5(4) |
Reported |
[2002] EWHC 1512 |
Reference |
Times, October 28, 1999 |
Abstract |
J sought a declaration that there had been a binding
contract between him and L on the terms of settlement offer forms, relating
to the Lloyd's Reconstruction and Renewal Settlement Offer, to which the
claimants had added a number of conditions before returning them to L. The
forms had been sent to J in August 1996 with a revised deadline for
acceptance of 11 September 1996. A few hours before that deadline had been
due to expire, J faxed the forms to L; however, J had expressed each form to
be subject to a number of conditions which, it was common ground, had constituted
counter offers to L's original offer. L had subsequently notified the
claimants' members' agent that the claimants had been amongst those who had
"accepted" the offer. J submitted that (1) L's
"acceptance" had given rise to a binding contract on the terms of
the offer as subject to the conditions attached by J, and (2) L was estopped
from asserting that the claimants had not been acceptors. Held, giving judgment for the defendants, that
(1) it was likely that Lloyd's "acceptance" had merely been an
acknowledgement of receipt. In any event, the matter had to be viewed objectively.
It had been obvious that the Renewal Settlement Offer was an "all or
nothing" offer, which had either to be accepted or rejected. The
agreement had simply not been open to negotiation and, even if it had been
negotiable, it would have been bizarre for L to communicate its acceptance of
J's counter offer by the indirect method of notifying J's members' agent, and
(2) the estoppel argument also failed as there had been no evidence of an
unequivocal representation by L or of J having acted to his detriment in
reliance upon any such representation. |
Subject |
Insurance |
Keywords |
Conditions, Lloyds Names, Offer and acceptance, Settlement |
Counsel |
For J: In person. For L: Joanne Wicks |
Solicitors |
For J: In person. For L: Solicitor Society of Lloyd's |
Transcript |
1997 Folio Nos 1147/1148 |
Cases cited |
|