Current Law Cases
Scope |
Letter of credit; fraud suspected by bank but
not alleged; whether bank entitled to refuse payment |
Case |
Society of Lloyd's v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce |
Court |
(QBD) Queens Bench Division |
Jurisdiction |
UKEW |
Judgment |
|
Judges |
Saville, J. |
Legislation |
|
Reported |
[1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 579 |
Reference |
|
Abstract |
A beneficiary claimed against a bank under a letter of
credit. The bank claimed that it was entitled to decline to pay if, while not
alleging actual fraud by the beneficiary, it had material which would have
led a reasonable banker to believe or infer that there was fraud. Held, that (1) it was no defence to plead the
matters alleged, which would have cast the burden of proving the absence of
fraud on a beneficiary. The letter of credit transaction was independent and
it was irrelevant that the bank might later be liable to its customer; (2)
the position was no different whether the document was a documentary letter
of credit, a performance guarantee or a standby letter of credit. |
Subject |
Banking and finance |
Keywords |
Fraud, Letters of credit |
Counsel |
|
Solicitors |
|
Cases cited |
|