Welcome

By joining the conversation you are accepting our community rules and terms. You also agree to the public display of your profile, including your name, and your commenting history. Please email feedback and questions to moderator@wsj.com.

If you would like to be notified when your response status has changed please sign up for notifications within “My Profile” tab under “Settings”.

The conversation will close on this article 48 hours from publication.

Join the conversation
1000 characters remaining
B
Subscriber
I still find it hard to believe that traditional numbered money storage accounts don't exist.  They pay a negative return (user fees but no interest payments) and have the "full faith and credit" of Swiss banks. As long as neither party blabs . . . .
K
Subscriber
If the IRS is so effective at bringing tax cheats, using foreign accounts,  to justice, how did Paul Manafort get away with cheating for so long.  It took Robert Mueller and dozens of dedicated prosecutors to bring him to justice and they don't work for the IRS.  If Manafort hadn't been associated with Trump, he'd still be getting away with massive tax evasion.
P
Subscriber
I suppose it had to happen with this President, the "nation of laws" actually trying to enforce laws!
S
Subscriber
The IRS has made expat life hell. It is impossible to keep US accounts and ads and foreign banks and brokers are reluctant to provide services because of the risks of FACTA. In addition  the tax system is complicated and unfair.  The idea that you should pay US taxes for no services is already twisted. In addition IRS tries to apply the US tax code to your foreign tax bill.  At least look at net tax paid abroad vs net tax theoretically due in the US and only require the difference (as well as allowing "overpayment"to be rolled forward as a future credit).
Most expats not only pay their taxes but are also small fry. As the article notes $16Bn has been raised from 50,000 many of whom are not even expats vs 7MM expats. If non-taxation of overseas operations of companies is ok, why not the same for individuals?
M
Subscriber
Use the foreign tax credit to get back the taxes that you paid to the other country.
Benjamin Singh
Subscriber
That doesn't work if you live someplace with high expenses and high income, while simultaneously keeping housing costs down. Like perhaps Hong Kong. Overseas taxation is completely out of hand. Compliance costs thousands every year, the taxes are most certainly not ZERO. Perhaps it should be mentioned how difficult it is to plan for retirement when the banks and my OWN government treats me like a criminal and uses FATCA as the whip to keep me inline. 
Tomas Pajaros
Subscriber
How does this article not even mention the Panama Papers expose’  ??
L
Subscriber
From the writer, Laura Saunders:

I work with limited space, and the Panama Papers expose had far more to do non-U.S. citizens than with U.S. citizens. As one D.C. criminal tax lawyer said to me, "We knew this wasn't a big U.S. story because our phones weren't ringing." 

The U.S. crackdown did help inspire other crackdowns and information sharing globally. But that's another story . . .

THX. 
Tomas Pajaros
Subscriber
Wiki listing Americans who were exposed in the Panama Papers leaks:

Numerous donors to former US President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as to the Clinton Foundation and its associated charities.[418][419]
R
Subscriber
The U.S. tax system is terrible for expats (citizens residing abroad).  They must spend thousands annually to comply with the U.S. tax and reporting requirements, and be subjected to additional taxation, or risk having their passport revoked.  The U.S. tax system should be revamped to eliminate citizen based taxation, as is the case for almost every other country in the world.
J
Subscriber
ABSOLUTELY. I used to live abroad and it’s an abomination. Zero benefits and still have to pay taxes. Nice being the only country in the world enforcing such stupidity. 

We we need to ENCOURAGE Americans to work and live abroad, not saddle them with unnecessary cost and headache
B
Subscriber
Well look what it took to finally nail Manafort but at least those asset forfeitures should more than cover the investigation costs.

This is the other lucrative branch of corporate welfare.  Big time money launderers having no fear of detection, you just buy off the right people right?  Right Donny? Or get yourself elected as POTUS so you can destroy the IRS or try.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Don't spam. There is a Manafort article on the front page. Post about Manafort there. 
T
Subscriber
Manafort is worse than broke, he's in deep debt.
M
Subscriber
It's not that hard to be in compliance with the new electronic forms and filing. You do have to go around to your offshore banks and get statements, convert currency, etc. I think that one bank that we have pays us under $1 in interest per year but we report it anyways.
Brent Janezic
Subscriber
Yes its easy to fill out a FBAR.  It's not simple , easy, or cheap to complete your return, though.   Last year my federal return was 90 pages, and I am just a corporate guy with some accounts in Canada leftover after I worked there a few years.  
W
Subscriber
So, the IRS is panicked that you are not paying a few dollars of tax on the tiny interest on your Swiss savings account?  Do you also have to pay tax on the interest to the Swiss?    It seems like as long as Dems are allowed in Washington, there is a rational reason for keeping some money "out of their reach" oversees. Or is prudent financial planning supposed to be illegal now?  


B
Subscriber
So disingenous my friend look at the level of fraud by Mr. Manafort alone and he is hardly alone. .  Oh and they probably haven't nailed Manafort on all his crimes but this will do.

Are you trying to claim the GOP and conservatives in general have the moral high ground when it comes to money launderers? 


R
Subscriber
Manafort apparently ignored the law.  So more or less reporting would have no effect on scofflaws. 
R
Subscriber
When I think of Switzerland, I think of tax evasion and money laundering. It's a beautiful place, but I don't plan to visit there because for as long as I can remember it has sought and made piles of money from illegal financial transactions. I suspect the City of London may be next.
S
Subscriber
and, i think of the billions they made in WW2.  the whole place is filled with smiling faced but morally corrupt creatures/
A
Subscriber
Maybe they could stop people flying out of Minnesota headed to Somalia with suitcases full of cash defrauded from child care providers? These would be the very same Somalis that Obama dumped on them whether they wanted them or not. And then there's all the other mechanisms of transporting money out of the US to terrorist strongholds.

But, Obama himself already flew $400M in untraceable cash to Iran. So it's all good because they're just following his example.

https://www.minnpost.com/new-americans/2018/05/what-you-need-know-about-somali-money-transfers-and-mysterious-bags-full-cash/
J
Subscriber
You shouldn't chat on taxes - but this article makes the U.S. in general and the IRS in particular look positively Soviet.
W
Subscriber
Looks like all the crazies are out today.  Trump hasn’t tweeted some gigantic lie for them to defend so they have time to comment here.  

This isn’t hard.  The law is the law.  Legally avoid every tax you can, that’s why we have laws, but pay your taxes when they are due and you’ll have no issues.  Cheat the IRS you are cheating your fellow citizen and you should be caught and prosecuted for it,  

D
Subscriber
No other country in the world taxes their citizens on earnings outside the country.

The USA has gone scumbag.
S
Subscriber
this is because the tax code is also used as a political apparatus.  don't be so naive or indignant.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
So if you’re not a big government lover like Big Wayne, you’re a “crazy”.

Guess what Wayne, you’re a Marxist.
B
Subscriber
You don't even know what a "Marxist" is David. Just shut up.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
I know very well what a Marxist is.

Its not your place to tell others on the board to shut up. 
R
Subscriber
Wayne has not a clue what the issues are as he has not lived outside the US nor had a foreign account as a US citizen to understand the requirements and penalties.  Draconian, and not in step with other countries. 
T
Subscriber
For many, the tax law is not simple, not clear, and not consistent.  Defining many business expenses is subjective and the definitions are ever evolving. 

If you're a US citizen, working for a foreign company in a foreign country, how US tax law applies to business expenses is anything but clear. 
W
Subscriber
Good, IRS.  Go get ‘em.  
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Wayne worships his beloved government.
Allen Lewis
Subscriber
Abolish the IRS
A
Subscriber
abolish free loading.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Agreed. Let’s immediately close all government programs and departments not related to national security, law enforcement and the court system. Imagine, the entire federal government could operate for $1 trillion a year or less!
W
Subscriber
You have absolutely no idea of what you write.  None.  Zero.  Zippo.  Nada.  
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Really ? Be more specific.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Oh seeing your other comment, I see you’re a big government progressive.

Return the federal guvmint to its constitutional duties, and its expenditures would be a small fraction of what they are today. #FACT
A
Subscriber
Is that all you GOT?
John Briscoe
Subscriber
Manafort now pleading guilty to conspiracy, money laudering and tax evasion.
Typical Trump minion.
Many more to come.
D
Subscriber
Al Sharpton (D) has been a tax cheat for over ten years.

Nearly every Criminals in Jail are ....democrats.
R
Subscriber
All of them, or just Tea Party supporters?
Justin Murray
Subscriber
The US has the distinction of maintaining a policy that the only nation that legally practices slavery does - global tax collection.
David Mcmahon
Subscriber
Yeah what is up with the Facta law. The US government thinks it has legal jurisdiction over foreign companies?
F
Subscriber
The U.S. government, in particular the IRS, has legal jurisdiction over the earnings of U.S. citizens whether or not those earnings accrue in the U.S. or its territories.  If you want to avoid this particular anomaly you must renounce your U.S. citizenship and pay an exit tax.
L
Subscriber
“More than ever, there’s no place to hide,” says Mr. Skarlatos.

Ain't that the truth? It's going to be so cozy for the clueless millennials when they grow up and realize what they voted for.
J
Subscriber
The big boys hide their money in plain sight by setting up "charitable foundations."

Since they are not only rich, but also powerful, they can set up foundations with the friends on the payroll and watching the money.

Appreciated assets are contributed to the "foundation" and are sold in the "foundations" name and never taxed.  Even better, they get a tax write-off for the "donation."

All of these wealthy, powerful people do this.  They never give their money directly to the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, or the like

There is a reason why these "foundations" are called the Ford Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation.  The get the tax benefits and maintain control.
M
Subscriber
all the time beating their chests about how philanthropic they are. of course mark(mr. facebook) sets up a LLC to be able to dole out his tax free money to lackies he prefers.
Lee Zehrer
Subscriber
And of course they then draw big salaries as employees of the foundations while their expense accounts pay for the life style with private jets and etc. The Clintons figured out this one.
G
Subscriber
You forgot one important element of the "foundations".  The "benefactors" then typically go out and advocate for the estate tax, while the "foundation" takes care of their children.
G
Subscriber
Wait until they get their hands on your voting records. They have proven themselves to be completely corrupt. It's easier to pay your taxes and vote progressive if you follow their thought line and audit theory. Just anotjer corrupt alphabet agency. 
John Macwilliams
Subscriber
I've often wondered why, in. the supposed freest country in the World, how come the IRS goes after ordinary people who made mistakes in our bizanteen tax law? Maybe I'm wrong, but I have heard stories of  raids and confiscation against grandpas and grandmas. If I'm wrong, tell me. If the IRS is really warm and genteel, let me know that too. Or is the federal government running a huge money laundering scheme where their employees, on average, make a lot more than the ave. citizen?
T
Subscriber
Having grandchildren should cover you from having to pay your taxes?
A
Subscriber
What part of tax evading do you need explained?
W
Subscriber
I’ve been audited and made mistakes on my returns over the years.  I found the IRS to be well behaved, factual and easy to work with.  They WILL come after you if you lie, cheat or steal, as they should.


E
Subscriber
Western Union is the biggest scam for illegals sending money to their failed  countries. Then we have to pay their medical care. 
John Macwilliams
Subscriber
We could have built two walls with that money.
A
Subscriber
Why do we need two?
T
Subscriber
You also get a lot of services done at lower cost.
David Blumenthal
Subscriber
I do not see this. Most mexicans do NOT work for less. If you want a worker for less, pay a black or white American in CASH.
B
Subscriber
Yeah the rich folks just bring the cash in their  briefcase  or use their shell companies.
D
Subscriber
the big boys will be fine.  they use sophisticated means of concealing money offshore.  the little guy, not so much.   the little guy cannot afford the tax magicians that the big guys can afford.  as usual therefore, the squeeze is on the little guy.
R
Subscriber
"Since 2009, more than 56,000 U.S. taxpayers in the program have paid $11.1 billion to resolve their issues."  

I guess those 56K were not "big boys" huh? lol
A
Subscriber
tax evasion is not just for the wealthy. Simple percentages will bare out every class cheats there are simply more middle and lower class cheats,  
B
Subscriber
I would have believed you until recent events show that the rich just seem to be getting greedier and greedier and as noted they  have the means to hide it better.
S
Subscriber
So all of those people mentioned who paid tens of millions in fines are just the "little guys", huh? 
D
17 billion sounds like a lot of money but it's only about a weeks worth of spending. Once that's gone it's gone. This isn't a lake of cash fed by an underground stream.
The FATCA rules punish low income earners overseas and return pennies to the Treasury. It does way more harm than good.
A
Subscriber
The  reasoning this people will continue to pay their share..... so it is not  a one and done.
D
Subscriber
What share though? Why do expats -- non-resident U.S. citizens -- need to pay taxes into a system they don't use? 

And before you say "State  department, emergency evacuations!",  know that you pay a fee per service at the consulate, and the marines aren't going to sweep in and evacuate American citizens at a time of crisis (seriously, that's laughable). 

Look at it this way, Art:

Let's say you were born in NY and moved to CA at some point in your life. 

NY passes a law saying that anyone who has an NY-issued birth certificate must report their global income and pay tax on that to New York, regardless of where the person lived.   If your bank in CA doesn't comply, then the authorities in NY cut their access to the financial markets. 

Would you think it's fair that you, as a resident of CA, has to pay another state tax on your local income?   

Of course you don't.  But that's the reality for millions of honest Americans living abroad. 

Criminal. 
D
17 billion sounds like a lot of money but it's only about a weeks worth of spending. Once that's gone it's gone. This isn't a lake of cash fed by an underground stream.
The FATCA rules punish low income earners overseas and return pennies to the Treasury. It does way more harm than good.
David Soto
Subscriber
Gee, someone at the IRS should send Trump a warning tweet before Mueller brings the hammer down on poor Don The Con's head.
David Soto
Subscriber
Gee, someone at the IRS should send Trump a warning tweet before Mueller brings the hammer down on poor Don The Con's head.
D
Subscriber
Agent Orange should be target #1, followed close Mnution and Betty Voss.
T
Subscriber
Who's Mnution and Betty Voss?  
S
Subscriber
Hillary?
D
Subscriber
Yes, go after the HSBC where James Comey was a board member. HSBC is the bank of choice for the Drug Cartels and The Clinton Foundation. 
S
Subscriber
Also go after Deutsche Bank has issues money laundering and is the only leader to the Donald since no American bank view the Don as credit worthy.   
×

Ban User?

Are you sure you would like to ban this user?

Note: Banning this user will also place this response in the Rejected queue.